vincemease.com

03/16/2010

A Theory of Addiction Relapse Prevention

Filed under: Self Improvement — Tags: , , — kuru @ 1:07 pm
William Berry asked:




When I first decided to write an article about relapse prevention, I felt anxious about what to include or exclude. I initially thought about all the material I have on relapse prevention, and how I could integrate it into one article. The truth is, I consider everything I do in treatment as relapse prevention, with the exception of helping someone get into treatment when they are actively using.

Over the course of my career I have written my own outlines for educational groups and the handouts, which I recently turned into a workbook being edited for publishing. The first educational group in my curriculum is on the disease concept. I believe all relapse prevention starts here. Accepting that one has a disease, however it was contracted, through genetics, social influence including but not limited to simple habit, or as a result of trauma, is the building block for recovery.

I next focus on how this disease affects the perception of reality of an addict. Simply, addicts are subject to cognitive distortions which alter the perception of reality. The most prolific example of this is when an addict or alcoholic is in denial. Reality demonstrates they have an addiction. Others who have an objective perspective are able to see this clearly. Yet the addict believes that their problems are the result of many things, none of which are their drinking or using excessively. Of course this is not the only distortion. Others that are common include rationalizing, justifying, minimizing and projecting. I would refer anyone interested in further explanation of distortions common to addicts to Abraham Twerski’s book “Addictive thinking: Understanding Self Deception.”

The next step in my curriculum focuses on teaching client’s to challenge thinking. Since an addict has these distortions, challenging them becomes imperative to recovery. Besides typical cognitive distortions mentioned above, a relapse, and the thinking that leads to it, begins before the actual consumption of a substance. Terence Gorski has described the “Phases and Warning Signs of Relapse” in both books and pamphlets. One of the common factors in his theory is the change in thinking that occurs as one heads for relapse. Again, this reiterates the importance of challenging one’s thinking.

The true question however, is how does one identify when their thinking is distorted, or when it is setting them up for a relapse. The 12 step programs discuss “stinking thinking” and it is common to hear there or in treatment centers “that’s your addiction talking.” But it is difficult for a person to identify when his or her own thinking is heading in a dysfunctional fashion.

When I discuss relapse prevention in educational groups, I begin with the basics of relapse prevention: complete abstinence, (no use of mood altering chemicals), attending 12 step meetings as frequently as recommended for the length of sobriety, sharing in the meetings, working the steps, working with a sponsor and, if in formal treatment, a therapist, using sober support, and applying knowledge gained in treatment to recovery. Additionally, avoiding people, places, and things that are associated with addiction and adding new people, places, interests and hobbies is important to sustaining recovery.

Normally, I follow the basics with what I call the three essentials, and what 12 step programs assert as cornerstones of their programs. I also believe these are essential to answering the above question, “how does one identify when their thinking is distorted, or when it is setting them up for a relapse?” The three essentials are Honesty, Openmindedness, and Willingness.

Honesty includes the ability for one to be honest with oneself, having attained the ability to recognize and challenge rationalizations, justifications, and other cognitive distortions, as well as recognize and share emotions. It also includes the ability to be open and forthcoming with others, especially those identified as confidants. It includes the ability to question oneself and especially the motivations for actions in any given situation. It also includes the ability to get past facades or self-projections which are designed to control how others perceive the individual; and share the true, natural, authentic self with another.

Open-mindedness is an essential in recovery and relapse prevention. It includes humility, the ability to humble oneself truly and accept that one may not know what is best at any given moment. It is the ability to truly accept feedback, to be fully aware that others’ perceptions may be more accurate than one’s own perception. This is of utmost importance when considering “The Phases and Warning Signs of Relapse” I mentioned earlier. Many ask during and at the conclusion of that educational topic, “What do I do if I’m unaware that I am in a relapse phase?” The only answer to that question is to become aware that you are in a relapse phase. How does one become aware? This question has two possible answers. The first is honest self-evaluation, including the ability to objectively look at one’s own thinking (I will speak more of this a little later). This alone is often not enough for even the most diligently self-evaluative person. That is where open-mindedness comes in: the need to be humble, and evaluate the feedback received from others, without becoming defensive.

The third foundation is Willingness. An individual, being honest with self and others, open-minded to others’ feedback, must be willing to make the necessary changes in thinking and behavior. This may seem simple. But to borrow a saying from AA, “this is a simple program, not an easy one”. Addicts often want the way they feel to change, but when told what they need to do to facilitate the change; they find excuses or otherwise balk at the necessary action. Willingness is therefore essential to prevent a relapse.

I will now discuss the importance of being able to step back and look at one’s thinking objectively. This is a subject which is receiving attention in journal articles of late. Without even searching the subject, I have read two articles about it. One was entitled “Mental Balance and Well Being: Building Bridges Between Buddhism and Western Psychology” by B. Allan Wallace and Shauna Shapiro and was in the journal “American Psychologist, V.61, n. 7, October 2006. Another was given to me by a colleague after we discussed this topic casually. It was entitled “The Application of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Interventions in the Treatment of Co-Occurring Addictive and Mood Disorders” and was written by Kimberly Hopes PsyD.

This topic also reminds me of a group session I was having one night. In attendance were three male clients and myself. These three clients had all been inpatient together, and were now in the Intensive Outpatient Program. There length of clean time varied minimally in the grand scheme of things, but to them it may have seemed longer. In the course of the discussion, this topic came up. All three had discussed incidence where they had been able to step back from the emotional intensity of a situation. They were focusing on how they reacted differently in this situation then in the past. I raised how they had all been able to step back from their thinking and emotional states. I also pointed out how in early recovery when experiences are new in sobriety; this ability is sometimes easier than later in recovery. I posed the question “how do you plan to keep this ability in later recovery?” The replies were similar. The responses centered on the need to remain aware of their thinking, to step back and remember they did not have to engage in the emotional events. They discussed how realizing they had power over their thinking, at least the thoughts following their automatic thoughts which lead to their perceptions, helps them to step back and look at situations objectively.

This is the heart of mindfulness. This is the heart of Eastern philosophy. And it is extremely beneficial to recovery. It leads to the ability to step back from emotionally charged situations. It leads to the ability to recognize the mood as transient. This allows the urges usually associated with emotionally charged situations to lose power. And this leads to a more successful recovery from addiction.

One way to attain this mindfulness is through one’s chosen spirituality. This can be through simply turning one’s will over, or through meditation. Meditation, another topic getting attention in journal articles of late, has been proven to be effective in improving mood even for a novice to meditating. As one religious leader once told me, “prayer is asking God, meditation is listening for the answer.” Another way to attain it is through cognitive challenging, although, and despite my reliance on cognitive therapy, I find it less effective than either the spiritual component or meditation.

In conclusion, reducing relapse is a daunting task. It begins by following the behavioral suggestions for recovery. Being honest, open-minded, and willing would be cognitive changes, as they involve a change in perspective. This provides a strong foundation. Mindfulness adds another tool, one that is receiving accolades and attention these days, but has been around for centuries. Besides relapse prevention, it offers a more fulfilling recovery. I look at the educational portion of my job as helping clients understand they have a disease. This disease affects the way they think. If they become able to step back from their thinking and challenge it, they are beginning the objectivity that assists in recovery. Moving further into mindfulness promotes and deepens recovery. And finally, everything in recovery is about relapse prevention.

03/10/2010

Motivation Theories

Filed under: Self Improvement — Tags: , , — kuru @ 12:39 am
Munyaradzi Chinongoza asked:




There have been several motivational theories created by people over time, however seeing how they are theories and not proven facts there are some that people believe and others that people do not believe. One of the most popular and well known theories comes from Abraham Maslow and it is called the hierarchy of needs.

This theory is taught in many philosophy and psychology classes in schools all over North America. It states that people would like to satisfy different needs and some of them we find more important than others. Not only this but some of these needs are more pressing then the others. As we satisfy one of our needs, it then becomes less important to us, other needs therefore become more important to us and become motivators of our behavior.

Maslow therefore says we have a hierarchy of needs. The most proponent needs that we have are shown at the bottom of the ladder, as the prepotency decreases we progresses upwards. The first need is called self actualization needs. Self actualization needs require meeting your own best potential and for you to do your own best things.

The next one is called esteem. Esteem involves having respect for other individuals having respect for yourself and also recognition. After this we have belonging which is being affiliated being accepted and also being apart of something. The second last one is safety needs, which is being physically safe and having psychological security. Last but not least there is physiological which includes hunger, thirst, *** and rest.

Another motivational theory is that we are motivated by money. Money means different things for different people. Money can mean status, survival, belonging achievement and a lot of other things, you can take your pick. In the end it all simply depends on the type of person that you are.

03/08/2010

Leadership 5 - Theory X, Theory Y

Ian Glickman Ph.D asked:




“Know thyself” - Plato

According to an American Society for Training and Development study, job knowledge is the only thing that ranks higher than communication in determining good leadership. One of the most important ways a leader communicates to his or her group is by example and attitude, and attitude usually determines behavior.

What’s your general attitude toward your colleagues? Are you a Theory X leader or a Theory Y leader? Theory X and Theory Y are well-researched leadership principles. In a nutshell, Theory X states that people inherently dislike their jobs, see them as a necessary evil, are unmotivated, and must be externally controlled throughout the day by coercion, direction, or threat of punishment. Theory Y, on the other hand, states that work is natural and allows one to express oneself physically and creatively (i.e., work is ego-satisfying). Most managers have a mindset combining both of these theories, but, without a sophisticated psychological instrument, it might be difficult to determine the proportions of each. When motivating subordinates and leading by example, however, some degree of introspection and self-evaluation is helpful if we want to work smarter and more efficiently. Evaluation can get tricky because you can have a Theory Y person trapped in the body of a Theory X company. This is known as the “press of corporate culture” (which opens up the corporate culture can of worms-more on that in another post).

Let’s try to evaluate our attitudes regarding Theory X and Theory Y management style:

1. In your leadership role, do you feel more like a policeman or a teacher?

2. Do you find some degree of meaning and value in your work? If yes, how much?

3. Do you think your team members or employees find meaning in their work? If so, how much?

Scenario One: You feel that you are more of a teacher/mentor who works with intrinsically motivated people who find value and meaning in their jobs.

Scenario Two: You’re stuck in a meaningless job with little value and act like a policeman all day to a bunch of Theory X employees. (”I’m telling ya doc, it’s them, not me!”)

It’s okay if you responded that you feel like a cop in a valueless job, which, now that you mention it, is rather meaningless. It’s okay because you know where you stand. And knowledge is a good thing. However, if this is the case and you’re not just experiencing a temporary bout of clinical depression, you’re going to come off as quite INCONGRUENT, even hypocritical, when you give your next pep talk or motivational speech. Incongruence is the opposite of genuine. You will, of course, still be leading by example, but I fear it may not be the example you wish to set. Genuineness is a good thing; incongruence is not a good thing. You don’t want your employees saying, “That manager is like, soooo totally incongruent!” Though incongruent is the technical term, I’ve heard the condition stated in much more colorful language.

Now the goal of the game is to try to move your peg from Scenario Two to Scenario One. The reason behind this, in case several haven’t already flooded your neural pathways, is that the research is abundantly clear that Scenario One is…well, just better, as confirmed by a long list of payoffs such as health, happiness, progress, and success.

Step 1: Try (very hard if you have to) to find one little, perhaps even minuscule, sense of meaning or fulfillment in some aspect of your work. Most jobs are multifaceted, so it might not be so difficult to locate one or two meaningful aspects. Write down, in concrete terms, what it is exactly that makes this facet meaningful.

Step 2: Observe (or shall I say, actively look for) some sense of creative motivation in your team member. Catch them doing something good and tell them you noticed it, as this is excellent feedback and positive reinforcement. Don’t make the same mistake I have made on several occasions of thinking that a person can’t possibly find meaning in their particular job. I have been surprised-make that astounded-to find out how much meaning and value the person sitting across from me placed on their work.

Perceptions and changes my be small at first, but bit by bit, you’ll be progressing in the right direction. More importantly, you’ll be leading by a more genuine example. Way to go, dude!

02/19/2010

Leadership Theory Notes - Thoughts on Competing Theories

Filed under: Self Improvement — Tags: , , — kuru @ 4:24 am
Ken Long asked:




Any survey of leadership theory will acquaint you with concepts like: leadership traits, leadership behaviors, transactional leadership styles, transformational leadership styles and organizational culture. The interplay of these different schools of thought offer a rich source of insight into human behavior organizational performance. Here are some notes to get you started down this path from one manager’s perspective:

Culture is an extraordinarily powerful aspect of organizational dynamics. I’m beginning to think is the most important thing of all, perhaps because it’s the aspect least under our own control.

The idea of the Epiphany in the Carpool is an excellent metaphor for creative brainstorming. The members of the carpool are taken out of their normal cultural setting and placed in an area where conversation and cross talk is inevitable and this can lead to extraordinary results. The story of Bill Gore and his application of leadership principles to create a very creative culture shows the potential that can happen when the right ingredients come together in terms of culture and leadership and business market.

The aspects of the socialization process of strong cultures from page 435 in the Organizational Behavior Workbook by Osland (et. al.) is an accurate map of this college’s culture. The discussion of the importance of stories and storytelling as a reinforcing mechanism is directly applicable.

The use of symbols, and jargon language, rituals and ceremonies are an important part of any business culture.

Many college curricula are still treating culture as something that other groups have, not us. And we look at it as a set of external handles enabling us to get a grip on the other or as a set of buttons we can push to go to the right floor.

Edgar Schein is one of the great original thinkers in the area of organizational culture. His work figures prominently in my research. His mechanisms for influencing culture correspond directly to most situations. Reviewing his work would surely be of benefit to most organizational thinkers.

02/01/2010

Hypnosis Research and Current Theories

Filed under: Self Improvement — Tags: , , — kuru @ 1:19 am
Chris Dreyer asked:




There has been much research including experimental and clinical studies that have attempted to uncover current theories behind what is so unique about hypnosis. According to current hypnosis research theories the ability to experience a state of hypnosis outside the formal hypnotic setting and how it is related to the hypnotizability of an individual is a function more closely related to their disposition. People can also respond positively to hypnotic suggestions while they are engaged in vigorous physical activity.

There are many methods of hypnosis, some more current than others. The development of a popular technique known as neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) has found use in current sales, advertising and corporate training organizations.

There is also a popular method of hypnotism called induction which involves immobilization and relaxation of the subject. A typical session would begin with an induction procedure that asks the person to focus his or her eyes on a fixation point and to relax and concentrate on the voice of the hypnotist. This model was one of the first to be developed. A person with moderate interpersonal skills and the ability to establish a relationship of trust is more easily hypnotized using the induction methods of hypnosis.

Current research theories show that hypnosis and trance look a lot like the awake state physiologically and that they are both different from the sleep state. Research has shown that there are many therapeutic techniques that use current hypnosis theories such as acupuncture, bio-feedback and visualization to name a few.

Since the beginning of modern times, there has been a great amount of effort devoted to the claims that hypnotic suggestions allow people to transcend the voluntary capacities normally attributed to individuals. The capacity to learn at a speedier rate, have a better memory, be stronger and have better eye sight are just a few of the attributes that are mentioned.

Current research into hypnosis theories is a thriving topic for clinical application and scientific inquiry. To see representation of this fact one can simply look to affiliates of the International Society of Hypnosis; Professional organizations such as the Society for
Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis and several others. There have been clinical studies that indicate hypnosis is effective in the relief of pain in patients suffering from cancer, burns and leukemia.

One of the dominant theories of hypnosis is the neo-dissociative theory. It contends that conscious processing is divided into non-interacting ’streams,’ that allows for suggestions to bypass the executive control process and monitoring functions of the brain.

Some of the non-scientific theories of hypnosis frame it in terms of energy fields, invisible bodily fluids, supernatural forces, and alternate planes of existence. Throughout the research to find a current definition of hypnosis, modern hypnotic camps individually maintain their radically unique conceptions of hypnosis.

Current hypnosis research results in more truthful responses, enhances the memory of past events like brand “imprinting” advertising, and elicits greater emotional response. It generates greater respondent creativity and brainstorming activity as well.

In the final analysis, most current hypnosis research theories are designed to illuminate the nature of specific hypnotic phenomena such as analgesia or amnesia then to provide evidence for any overarching theory of hypnosis.

Powered by WordPress